BNSS 163 — Power to issue order in urgent cases of nuisance or apprehended danger.

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023

Statutory text

(1) In cases where,
in  the  opinion  of  a  District  Magistrate,  a  Sub-divisional Magistrate  or  any  other  Executive  Magistrate
specially empowered by the State Government in this behalf, there is sufficient ground for proceeding under
this  section and immediate prevention or speedy remedy is desirable,  such Magistrate  may, by a  written
order stating the material facts of the case and served in the manner provided by section 153, direct any
person to abstain from a certain act or to take certain order with respect to certain property in his possession
or under his management, if such Magistrate considers that such direction is likely to prevent, or tends to
prevent, obstruction, annoyance or injury to any person lawfully employed, or danger to human life, health
or safety or a disturbance of the public tranquillity, or a riot, or an affray.
(2) An order under this section may, in cases of emergency or in cases where the circumstances do not
admit of the serving in due time of a notice upon the person against whom the order is directed, be passed
ex parte.
(3) An order under this section may be directed to a particular individual, or to persons residing in a
particular place or area, or to the public generally when frequenting or visiting a particular place or area.
(4) No order under this section shall remain in force for more than two months from the making thereof:
Provided that if the State Government considers it necessary so to do for preventing danger to human
life, health or safety or for preventing a riot or any affray, it may, by notification, direct that an order made
by a Magistrate under this section shall remain in force for such further period not exceeding six months
from the date on which the order made by the Magistrate would have, but for such order, expired, as it may
specify in the said notification.

(5) Any Magistrate may, either on his own motion or on the application of any person aggrieved, rescind
or  alter  any  order  made  under  this  section  by  himself  or  any  Magistrate subordinate  to  him  or  by  his
predecessor-in-office.
(6) The State Government may, either on its own motion or on the application of any person aggrieved,
rescind or alter any order made by it under the proviso to sub-section (4).
(7) Where  an  application  under sub-section  (5) or sub-section (6) is  received,  the Magistrate,  or  the
State Government, as the case may be, shall afford to the applicant an early opportunity of appearing before
him or it, either in person or by an advocate and showing cause against the order; and if the Magistrate or
the State Government, as the case may be, rejects the application wholly or in part, he or it shall record in
writing the reasons for so doing.
D.—Disputes as to immovable property
164.   Procedure   where   dispute   concerning   land   or   water   is   likely   to   cause   breach   of
peace.—(1) Whenever an Executive Magistrate is satisfied from a report of a police officer or upon other
information that a dispute likely to cause a breach of the peace exists concerning any land or water or the
boundaries thereof, within his local jurisdiction, he shall make an order in writing, stating the grounds of
his being so satisfied, and requiring the parties concerned in such dispute to attend his Court in person or
by an advocate on aspecified date and time, and to put in written statements of their respective claims as
respects the fact of actual possession of the subject of dispute.
(2)  For  the  purposes  of  this  section,  the  expression “land  or  water” includes  buildings, markets,
fisheries, crops or other produce of land, and the rents or profits of any such property.
(3)  A  copy  of  the  order  shall  be  served  in  the  manner  provided  by  this  Sanhita  for  the service of
summons upon such person or persons as the Magistrate may direct, and at least one copy shall be published
by being affixed to some conspicuous place at or near the subject of dispute.
(4) The Magistrate shall, without reference to the merits or the claims of any of the parties to a right to
possess the subject of dispute, peruse the statements so put in, hear the parties, receive all such evidence as
may be produced by them, take such further evidence, if any, as he thinks necessary, and, if possible, decide
whether any and which of the parties was, at the date of the order made by him under sub-section (1), in
possession of the subject of dispute:
Provided  that  if  it  appears  to  the  Magistrate  that  any  party  has  been  forcibly  and wrongfully
dispossessed within  two  months  next  before  the  date  on  which  the  report  of  a police  officer  or  other
information  was  received  by  the  Magistrate,  or  after  that  date  and before  the  date  of  his  order  under
sub-section (1), he may treat the party so dispossessed as if that party had been in possession on the date of
his order under sub-section (1).
(5) Nothing in this section shall preclude any party so required to attend, or any other person interested,
from showing that no such dispute as aforesaid exists or has existed; and in such case the Magistrate shall
cancel his said order, and all further proceedings thereon shall be stayed, but, subject to such cancellation,
the order of the Magistrate under sub-section (1) shall be final.
(6)  (a)  If  the  Magistrate  decides  that  one  of  the  parties  was,  or  should  under  the proviso  to
sub-section (4) be treated as being, in such possession of the said subject of dispute, he shall issue an order
declaring such party to be entitled to possession thereof until evicted therefrom in due course of law, and
forbidding all disturbance of such possession until such eviction; and when he proceeds under the proviso
to sub-section (4), may restore to possession the party forcibly and wrongfully dispossessed;
(b) the order made under this sub-section shall be served and published in the manner laid down in sub-
section (3).

(7) When any party to any such proceeding dies, the Magistrate may cause the legal representative of
the deceased party to be made a party to the proceeding and shall thereupon continue the inquiry, and if any
question arises as to who the legal representative of a deceased party for the purposes of such proceeding
is, all persons claiming to be representatives of the deceased party shall be made parties thereto.
(8) If the Magistrate is of opinion that any crop or other produce of the property, the subject of dispute
in a proceeding under this section pending before him, is subject to speedy and natural decay, he may make
an order for the proper custody or sale of such property, and, upon the completion of the inquiry, shall make
such order for the disposal of such property, or the sale-proceeds thereof, as he thinks fit.
(9)  The  Magistrate  may,  if  he  thinks  fit,  at  any stage  of  the  proceedings  under  this section,  on  the
application  of  either  party,  issue  a  summons  to  any  witness  directing  him  to attend  or  to  produce  any
document or thing.
(10) Nothing in this section shall be deemed to be in derogation of powers of the Magistrate to proceed
under section 126.

Back to BNSS