BNSS 356 — Inquiry, trial or judgment in absentia of proclaimed offender.

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023

Statutory text

(1) Notwithstanding anything
contained  in  this  Sanhita  or  in  any  other  law  for  the  time  being  in  force,  when  a  person  declared  as  a
proclaimed offender, whether or not charged jointly, has absconded to evade trial and there is no immediate
prospect of arresting him, it shall be deemed to operate as a waiver of the right of such person to be present
and tried in person, and the Court shall, after recording reasons in writing, in the interest of justice, proceed
with the trial in the like manner and with like effect as if he was present, under this Sanhita and pronounce
the judgment:
Provided that the Court shall not commence the trial unless a period of ninety days has lapsed from the
date of framing of the charge.
(2)  The Court  shall  ensure  that  the  following  procedure  has  been  complied  with  before  proceeding
under sub-section (1), namely: —
(i) issuance of two consecutive warrants of arrest within the interval of at least thirty days;
(ii) publish in a national or local daily newspaper circulating in the place of his last known address
of residence, requiring the proclaimed offender to appear before the Court for trial and informing him
that  in  case  he  fails  to  appear  within  thirty  days  from  the  date  of  such  publication,  the  trial  shall
commence in his absence;
(iii) inform his relative or friend, if any, about the commencement of the trial; and
(iv) affix information about the commencement of the trial on some conspicuous part of the house
or homestead in which such person ordinarily resides and display in the police station of the district of
his last known address of residence.

(3) Where the proclaimed offender is not represented by any advocate, he shall be provided with an
advocate for his defence at the expense of the State.
(4) Where  the  Court,  competent  to  try  the  case  or commit  for  trial,  has  examined  any  witnesses  for
prosecution  and  recorded  their  depositions,  such  depositions  shall  be  given  in  evidence  against  such
proclaimed offender on the inquiry into, or in trial for, the offence with which he is charged:
Provided that if the proclaimed offender is arrested and produced or appears before the Court during
such trial, the Court may, in the interest of justice, allow him to examine any evidence which may have
been taken in his absence.
(5) Where a trial is related to a person under this section, the deposition and examination of the witness,
may, as far as practicable, be recorded by audio-video electronic means preferably mobile phone and such
recording shall be kept in such manner as the Court may direct.
(6)  In  prosecution  for  offences  under  this  Sanhita,  voluntary  absence  of  accused  after  the  trial  has
commenced under sub-section (1) shall not prevent continuing the trial including the pronouncement of the
judgment even if he is arrested and produced or appears at the conclusion of such trial.
(7) No appeal shall lie against the judgment under this section unless the proclaimed offender presents
himself before the Court of appeal:
Provided that no appeal against conviction shall lie after the expiry of three years from the date of the
judgment.
(8) The State may, by notification, extend the provisions of this section to any absconder mentioned in
sub-section (1) of section 84.

Back to BNSS