IEA 126 — Professional communications

Indian Evidence Act, 1872

Statutory text

No  barrister,  attorney,  pleader  or  vakil,  shall at any  time  be
permitted,  unless  with  his  client’s  express  consent,  to  disclose  any  communication  made  to  him  in  the
course and for the purpose of his employment as such barrister, pleader, attorney or vakil, by or on behalf
of his client, or to state the contents or condition of any document with which he has become acquainted
in the course and for the purpose of his professional employment, or to disclose any advice given by him
to his client in the course and for the purpose of such employment:
Provided that nothing in this section shall protect from disclosure ––
(1) any such communication made in furtherance of any

[illegal] purpose,
(2) any fact observed by any barrister, pleader, attorney or vakil, in the course of his employment
as  such,  showing  that  any  crime  or  fraud  has  been  committed  since  the  commencement  of  his employment.
It  is  immaterial  whether  the  attention  of  such  barrister,

[pleader],  attorney  or  vakil  was  or  was  not directed to such fact by or on behalf of his client.
Explanation. –– The obligation stated in this section continues after the employment has ceased.
Illustrations
 (a) A, a client, says to B, an attorney –– “I have committed forgery, and I wish you to defend me.”
As  the  defence  of  a  man  known  to  be  guilty  is  not  a  criminal  purpose,  this  communication  is protected from disclosure.
(b)  A,  a  client,  says  to  B,  an  attorney  ––  “I  wish  to  obtain  possession  of  property  by  the  use  of  a forged deed on which I request you to sue.”
This  communication,  being  made  in  furtherance  of  a criminal  purpose,  is  not  protected  from disclosure.
(c)  A,  being  charged  with embezzlement,  retains  B, an  attorney,  to  defend him.  In  the  course  of the
proceedings, B observes that an entry has been made in A’s account book, charging A with the sum said to have been embezzled, which entry was not in the book at the commencement of his employment.
This  being  a  fact  observed  by  B  in  the  course  of  his  employment,  showing  that  a  fraud  has  been committed since the commencement of the proceedings, it is not protected from disclosure.

Back to IEA