IEA 6 — Relevancy of facts forming part of same transaction

Indian Evidence Act, 1872

Statutory text

Facts which, though not in issue, are so
connected with a fact in issue as to form part of the same transaction, are relevant, whether they occurred at the same time and place or at different times and places.
Illustrations
(a) A is accused of the murder of B by beating him. Whatever was said or done by A or B or the by-standers at the beating, or so shortly before or after it as to form part of the transaction, is a relevant fact.

5. See now the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Act 5 of 1908).

(b) A is accused of waging war against the

[Government of India] by taking part in an armed insurrection in which  property  is  destroyed,  troops  are  attacked  and  gaols  are  broken  open.  The  occurrence  of  these  facts  is relevant, as forming part of the general transaction, though A may not have been present at all of them.
(c)  A  sues  B  for  a  libel  contained  in  a  letter  forming  part  of  a  correspondence.  Letters  between  the  parties
relating  to  the  subject  out  of  which  the  libel  arose,  and  forming  part  of  the  correspondence  in  which it  is contained, are relevant facts, though they do not contain the libel itself.
(d) The question is, whether certain goods ordered from B were delivered to A. The goods were delivered to several intermediate persons successively. Each delivery is a relevant fact.

Back to IEA