IPC 92 — Act done in good faith for benefit of a person without consent

Indian Penal Code, 1860

Statutory text

Nothing  is  an  offence by reason of any harm which  it  may causes  to  a person for whose benefit it is done in good faith,  even without  that person's consent, if the circumstances are such that  it is impossible for that person to signify consent, or if that person is incapable of giving consent, and has no guardian or other person in lawful charge of him from whom it is possible to obtain consent in time for the thing to be done with benefit: Provided-
Provisos.
Provisos.-First.-That  this   exception  shall   not  extend   to  the intentional causing of death or the attempting to cause death;

Secondly.-That this  exception shall not extend to the doing of anything which the person doing it knows to be likely to cause death, for  any purpose  other than  the preventing  of death  or grievous  hurt,   or  the  curing  of  any  grievous  disease  or infirmity;
Thirdly.-That  this   exception  shall  not  extend  to  the voluntary causing  of hurt,  or to  the attempting to cause hurt, for any purpose other than the preventing of death or hurt;
Fourthly.-That  this  exception  shall  not  extend  to  the abetment of  any offence,  to the  committing of which offence it would not extend.
Illustrations (a) Z  is thrown from his horse, and is insensible. A, a surgeon, finds that Z requires to be trepanned. A, not intending Z's death, but in good  faith, for Z's benefit, performs the trepan before Z recovers his power of judging for himself. A has committed no offence.
(b) Z  is carried off by a tiger. A fires at the tiger knowing it to be  likely that  the shot  may kill Z, but not intending to kill Z, and in  good faith  intending Z's  benefit. A's  ball gives Z a mortal wound. A has committed no offence.
(c) A, a surgeon, sees a child suffer an accident which is likely to prove  fatal unless an operation be immediately performed. There is not time to apply to the child's guardian. A performs the operation in spite of  the entreaties  of the  child, intending, in good faith, the child's benefit. A has committed no offence.
(d) A  is in  a house  which is  on fire, with Z, a child. People below hold  out a  blanket. A  drops the  child, from  the  house-top, knowing it  to be  likely that  the fall  may kill  the child, but not intending to kill the child, and intending, in good faith, the child's benefit. Here,  even if  the child  is  killed  by  the  fall,  A  has committed no offence.
Explanation.-Mere pecuniary  benefit is  not benefit  within  the meaning of sections 88 89 and 92.

Back to IPC